PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
^GSPTSE vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ^GSPTSE and COST is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

^GSPTSE vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P TSX Composite Index (Canada) (^GSPTSE) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
9.69%
22.37%
^GSPTSE
COST

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

^GSPTSE:

2.07

COST:

2.13

Sortino Ratio

^GSPTSE:

2.81

COST:

2.74

Omega Ratio

^GSPTSE:

1.37

COST:

1.38

Calmar Ratio

^GSPTSE:

3.16

COST:

3.96

Martin Ratio

^GSPTSE:

12.23

COST:

9.25

Ulcer Index

^GSPTSE:

1.75%

COST:

4.39%

Daily Std Dev

^GSPTSE:

10.37%

COST:

19.07%

Max Drawdown

^GSPTSE:

-49.99%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

^GSPTSE:

-1.07%

COST:

-1.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^GSPTSE achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 6.94% return. Over the past 10 years, ^GSPTSE has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 5.41%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.97% annualized return.


^GSPTSE

YTD

3.26%

1M

1.83%

6M

14.87%

1Y

21.10%

5Y*

7.88%

10Y*

5.41%

COST

YTD

6.94%

1M

6.91%

6M

19.35%

1Y

38.72%

5Y*

28.58%

10Y*

22.97%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

^GSPTSE vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^GSPTSE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPTSE is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPTSE is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPTSE is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPTSE is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPTSE is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPTSE is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COST is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COST is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COST is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COST is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COST is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COST is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

^GSPTSE vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P TSX Composite Index (Canada) (^GSPTSE) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^GSPTSE, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.500.991.94
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^GSPTSE, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.001.392.52
The chart of Omega ratio for ^GSPTSE, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market1.001.201.401.601.181.36
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^GSPTSE, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.000.913.58
The chart of Martin ratio for ^GSPTSE, currently valued at 4.83, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.004.838.30
^GSPTSE
COST

The current ^GSPTSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the COST Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^GSPTSE and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.99
1.94
^GSPTSE
COST

Drawdowns

^GSPTSE vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^GSPTSE drawdown since its inception was -49.99%, smaller than the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^GSPTSE and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-4.04%
-1.49%
^GSPTSE
COST

Volatility

^GSPTSE vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P TSX Composite Index (Canada) (^GSPTSE) is 3.30%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that ^GSPTSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.30%
4.59%
^GSPTSE
COST
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab